The Free State of Jones Read Along

See a Problem?
Thank you for telling us about the trouble.
Friend Reviews
Community Reviews


Newton Knight
There is a misconception regarding the Canton of Jones in Mississippi. Some think this county seceded from the Confederacy, just the existent truth is they never left the Union. They remained loyal to their federal government, and some men even left to join the Spousal relationship army, just a grouping of men, some deserters from the Amalgamated Regular army and some slaves, banded together to form a resistance to what they considered to exist an invading force.
Rachel was a slave, a pretty woman with light pare. Her descendents tried to convince people that she was of Castilian heritage as a way to excuse her dark optics, dark hair, and tinted complexion. It is all rubbish, of course, merely people putting their racism on brandish when what they should exist is feeling proud that, despite her circumstances, she became a woman to be reckoned with. Ethel Knight wrote a damning biography of Newt simply possibly unintentionally revealed the more interesting part of the story. "Ethel not only restored Rachel'due south historical office, only she also unveiled a powerful, larger-than-life woman who had endured slavery, sexual exploitation, the Civil War Reconstruction, and Mississippi's mounting campaign for white supremacy and racial segregation. Most strikingly, Rachel seemed to have had as much bear on on the world around her equally it had on her."
Rachel Knight
Rachel had 3 children earlier the Ceremonious War; all the children were apparently from white fathers. As a slave, she didn't take much option who bent her over a table and flung her skirt up. The raping of female person slaves was an epidemic in the S. "Between 1890-1920 white Southern literature---especially newspapers---ordinarily portrayed interracial sexual relations every bit the product of sexual activity-crazed black 'fiends' ravishing innocent, virginal blondes, rather than as the product of white men raping black women or of blacks and whites participating in consensual sexual relations."
The interesting thing is, when these wealthy planters impregnated their slaves, they were condemning their own offspring to slavery. In their minds, they were helping to create more workers for their plantations. In that location is a disconnect in this reasoning that has me thinking that sex with their slaves, basically having a harem at their disposal, was more important to them than any thoughts of their ain claret being condemned to a life in chains.
I'one thousand sure Hollywood, in the new movie starring Matthew Mcconaughey, will make it a dear story betwixt Newt and Rachel. The author Victoria East. Bynum doesn't necessary disabuse that notion, but I couldn't help thinking, was this love or was Rachel just being practical? White men found her attractive. Maybe she was with the blastoff dog to keep from having to fend off the attentions of the other men. She had children with Newt, but what makes me experience a bit unsettled about buying the beloved story is that he likewise rumored to accept had children with her daughter. What the heck was going on out there in the deep Mississippi forest? To further complicate the motion picture, he remained married to his wife Serena for the residual of his life.
Men joined Newt out of fearfulness for their lives. They didn't desire to die on a battleground, fighting Yankees for rich planters. It wasn't exactly rubber being with Newt's band; many were caught and hung or shot. They were too suffering economic hardship from beingness away from their homes to go to war. When the Confederacy passed the Twenty Negro Police which immune any Southerner with twenty or more slaves to leave the war to get home to help with harvest, it became articulate to many men that the Confederate Authorities was only worried about the very richest of the rich. Does the man with twenty slaves really demand to go home? Information technology seems to me that this small-scale demographic had plenty of aid to bring in the harvest. Information technology was the man with no slaves, with a wife and a passel load of children, who needed to go home to assist.
Of course, the bulk of the soldiers were poor men with either a modest acreage or were sharecroppers without land. If you let those guys become home, there would be no army. I know many idea they were going to state of war to defend their "raights," merely in reality they were fighting to defend a organization in which they had no peel in the game.
12.2% of the population of Jones County were slaves. This was the lowest percentage of whatever canton in Mississippi. These were non men who aspired to be slave owners. Bynum traces back the history of these men as their ancestors came from Georgia and South Carolina to Mississippi to alive simple lives and avoid the corruption of "over civilization."
There was always something a little unlike virtually Jones County.
Victoria Eastward. Bynum is descended from one of the men who joined Newt Knight in his armed resistance to the Confederacy. I've washed some inquiry on my own family unit, and one of the things that happens is that as you collect the data and begin to put together a picture of who your ancestors are, you start to change how you retrieve about yourself. Discovering your roots is of import, but there is always the take a chance that you will discover that you lot are descended from scalawags or unscrupulous men or a murderer. To me that just adds spice to the stew that is a family tree. Bynum confessed that, one time she finished this book, she was going to miss living every day with these people who were so unique, so brave, and who resisted when many more should take.
If you wish to see more of my well-nigh contempo book and picture reviews, visit http://www.jeffreykeeten.com
I also take a Facebook blogger page at:https://www.facebook.com/JeffreyKeeten


curt ad for movie released today half dozen/24
from Smithsonian mag:
Matthew McConaughey thought the Free State of Jones script was the most exciting Civil War story he had ever read, and knew immediately that he wanted to play Newt Knight. In Knight's disobedience of both the Confederate Army and the deepest taboos of Southern civilisation McConaughey sees an uncompromising and deeply mor

curt ad for picture released today half-dozen/24
from Smithsonian magazine:
Matthew McConaughey idea the Complimentary State of Jones script was the most exciting Ceremonious War story he had ever read, and knew immediately that he wanted to play Newt Knight. In Knight's defiance of both the Confederate Regular army and the deepest taboos of Southern culture McConaughey sees an uncompromising and securely moral leader. He was "a man who lived by the Bible and the barrel of a shotgun," McConaughey says in an electronic mail. "If someone—no affair what their color—was existence mistreated or being used, if a poor person was being used by someone to get rich, that was a elementary wrong that needed to be righted in Newt's eyes....He did then deliberately, and to the hell with the consequences." McConaughey sums him upwards as a "shining light through the heart of this state's bloodiest fight. I really kind of marveled at him."
My Review
This is the definitive history of a 2+ yr insurrection against the Confederate States of America led by Newton Knight (my first cousin, 4 times removed) and the Knight Visitor (a band of Civil State of war deserters) in Jones County, Mississippi (where I was raised). The background and reasons for this insurgency against the Confederacy are complex, and primarily chronicle to class: Jones County had the lowest slave population in all of Mississippi, not existence blessed with the fertile lands of the Mississippi Delta region and many felt they were wrongfully called to fight the rich human being plantation/slave owner'south war for slaves and cotton.
Newt Knight, a yeoman farmer who owned no slaves, enlisted for service early on on and was injured in tardily 1861. Already angry upon hearing of the Confederacy's recent passage of the Xx-Negro law allowing an exemption from Confederate army service of one rich white male person for every 20 slaves he/his family owned, Knight decided to desert after hearing how his family was treated by an unsavory grapheme with Confederate ties too as how Knight'due south only horse had been appropriated by the Confederate cavalry as a Confederate taxation levied. After returning to Jones County, he and his band unleashed hellfire upon Confederates.
Quite a suspenseful drama is the whole story, including Knight's long-time affair with Rachel Knight, a slave of his male parent; the two had children together and ultimately became mutual police husband and wife.
The racist drama continued well into the 20th century with a 1948 miscegenation trial of Davis Knight, i of the male descendants who'd married a "white lady." The trial turned upon whether Davis' great-grandmother, Rachel, was a "full-blooded Negro" or was partly Indian. If the latter then Davis would not be the proscribed 1/8 blackness (a so-called "octoroon").
Bynum paints the story perfectly with her well-documented, thorough research and her more than than capable recounting. In my opinion, this volume betters the later book on the same subject field by Sally Jenkins and John Stauffer, The Country of Jones: The Small Southern County that Seceded from the Confederacy, that's based in big part on Bynum's hard piece of work.
...more than






So, the history of Newt Knight is interesting and I like how Bynum structured the volume
To be honest, I zoned out several times while listening to this. I remember I struggle with history books, specially in audio (run into Understanding Nippon: A Cultural History). Mahershala Ali, the narrator, is not at fault for my struggles though. He did an first-class job keeping an interested tone without over dramatizing anything (which I find some narrators of non-fiction will do in an try to be more engaging).And so, the history of Newt Knight is interesting and I like how Bynum structured the book:
I began the Civil War saga by tracing the roots of Jones Canton dissent back to the Revolutionary War era, and I ended it by connecting the story to the mod Ceremonious Rights era.
I establish information technology particularly keen that many of Knight's ancestors, and the ancestors of the men who joined The Knight Company, were involved in the Regulator Movement in N Carolina prior to the Revolutionary War. I am only aware of the Regulator Move because it serves every bit the historical backdrop to the fifth book in the Outlander serial, The Fiery Cross. I love when books connect to other books.
I would recommend this to anyone interested in Mississippi history. I'm no historian, but information technology seemed to be heavily researched and Bynum seems to be passionate about the subject. I may take to listen to this a second time around for whatsoever of the historical facts and details to stick with me, but that's this reader's trouble, and shouldn't be taken every bit a criticism of the book itself (or the narrator).
Further Reading:
Renegade South: Histories of Unconventional Southerners




Office of the structural issue of the book is that Burnam is at pains *not* to make this the story of Newt Knight. Her reasons for this are actually of import: she is great to clarify that the rebellion wasn't the result of one man'southward mission, but rather a reflection of broader schisms within Southern whites - the divergence betwixt cash-ingather-based, slaveowning, capitalist-aspiring planters and cocky-sufficient libertarian farmers, whose priority was independence not wealth. She achieves this very well - the strongest parts of the book are the early on chapters, which give context and background to Mississippi settlement and the communities which developed prior to the Ceremonious State of war.
The problem with non focusing on Newt, is that the second part of the volume, which deals with the mixed-race community, is not based on that broader movement only rather just Newt, his wife Serena and Rachel Knight. Both Rachel and Serena seemed to have supported the rebellion, merely their roles are left entirely unclear. Information almost how Rachel arrived in the County is provided, but and so she kinda slips out of the wealth of detail, re-emerging only in the terminal chapters to exist very pregnant. Her role during the rebellion - even such basic things as whether she fled or not - is unremarked on.
Bynum is also at lengths not to over interpret. Just when it comes to race issues, this makes the book very disjointed. She pretty much abstains on what Newt's moral views on slavery were (nevermind anyone else'due south) - because there is no evidence - but it makes the whole give-and-take of the rebellion seem completely separate to the issues of race-based slavery, and equality. The book feels near like two separate books, with the fairly crucial effect of how 1 led to the other: the rebellion to the mixed-race community - completely absent-minded. And it is kinda the most interesting question.
In dissimilarity, the descendents of Newt and Rachel get amend handling, leading to some interesting musings on the nature of race, and it'due south essentially social nature.
Overall, I would recommend this volume, just I besides think the topic is ripe for a treatment with a stronger focus on the through narrative of the community. ...more

The nigh powerful recommendation, I think: white Mississippi 'traditionalists' (ahem) are every bit committed to disparaging the Free Country of Jones as they are to upholding the award & virtue of the Confederacy. If they see something nefarious here, I know there's something real re: race!
...more
Though I liked it, this could have been a truly great book with a little more than narrative structure.
...more

I learned a lot about anti-slavery efforts in the south too as the anti-secessionist movement among yeoman farmers in Mississippi. Interesting stuff.
I was particularly disgusted to acquire of the origins of some racist myths that are withal perpetuated today, some of which have come out of my land's governor'due south mouth.
A well written, like shooting fish in a barrel to read book.I learned a lot almost anti-slavery efforts in the s too as the anti-secessionist motility amongst yeoman farmers in Mississippi. Interesting stuff.
I was particularly disgusted to learn of the origins of some racist myths that are still perpetuated today, some of which have come out of my state'south governor'due south oral cavity.
...more



For this reason I'd recommend seeing the film starting time for a clearer understanding of Knight, his motives, and the consequences of his deportment. The Jones Canton insurgency rises against non only the platitudes of segregation orthodoxy, as shown in the "race trial" of his groovy-grandson, Davis Knight. It besides challenges the reverse stereotype of redneck racism which sees all poor Southern whites as gap-toothed Dixiecrat lynchers. Knight'south anti-Amalgamated cause and "miscegenation" was, in fact, once offered as proof of such piney forest "backwardness". As a true rebel to the Confederacy and all information technology stood for Knight took his outlaw status into forbidden zones of race, creating a living legacy that shook the social order of Mississippi long later Reconstruction and his death.
Bynum also shows united states of america that the segregationist South was not "natural" nor etched in stone; that it was consciously synthetic and forced into constabulary. Older Mississippians, even into the 1920s, recalled a less totalitarian arroyo to colour lines. It was only through preventing the creation of a "third color" that racial polarity and exploitation could survive. The irony is that Newton Knight's "white Negro" descendants were finally granted honorary whiteness, but as a last-ditch ploy to fight the oncoming avalanche of "real" integration.
If looking for a recreation of the Jones County "secession from secession," this is non quite the book. Just information technology is an intriguing analysis of the deeper context of Knight'due south rebellion, its background and legacy; and an fantabulous safari into unexplored corners of geography and club lost to a world of ambivalent values. Equally Tip O'Neill said, all politics is local.
...more
A lot of reviewers here complain that she goes into a lot of unnecessary item, but this is really what makes histories similar this worth reading. They are non just a recounting of adventurous tales, or the stories of heroes (at whatever rate, Newt Knight makes for a rather odd kind of 'hero'), but explorations of why people do what they practise, and how communities function under stress and hostility. Her bibliography is very impressive, both in terms of the primary sources she uncovers and presents, and in terms of the range of secondary literature she brings to bear on this.
Among other things, books similar this show how complicated Southern social club was, and how controversial and ofttimes elitist secession and secession-sympathy was, which should assist dispel the view that secession was about independence from central control which should brand us sympathetic to secessionists: in fact, secessionism and the confederacy oft institute themselves having to violently repress many local communities and their very different racial and social ideas and mores.
...more
Despite those challenges, I plant this a pretty interesting read, as it presented a side of the Civil War near which I previously knew very piffling: that of anti-Confederate southerners.
Fair warning: fully half the page count of the volume is references & bibliography. If y'all're merely here to read what happened, and aren't that worried nearly the scholarly human foot notes that provide all principal sources, and so the book's effectively about 170 pages long.
...more than



When I started the book I had hoped it would exist based on the movie. I was disappointed to observe the book more of a documentary than a story. I, however, came to savour it as a documentary and history lesson. My mother's maiden proper noun is Knight so I have a personal interest in this ancestry. I am proud to at to the lowest degree by in the Knight name lineage. Newt was a brave man to live by his behavior and convictions. Sadly, he seems to have been vilified and shunned in histor
Another role of history non well knownWhen I started the book I had hoped it would exist based on the movie. I was disappointed to find the book more of a documentary than a story. I, yet, came to enjoy it as a documentary and history lesson. My mother's maiden name is Knight so I accept a personal involvement in this beginnings. I am proud to at least past in the Knight name lineage. Newt was a brave homo to alive past his beliefs and convictions. Sadly, he seems to take been vilified and shunned in history.
...moreOther books in the series
News & Interviews

Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.

Source: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/668649.The_Free_State_of_Jones
0 Response to "The Free State of Jones Read Along"
Post a Comment